This website uses JavaScript which is either not installed or is disabled.
Some pages may not display or even function correctly.
Home
About Us
What We Do
Company Profile
Project Schedule
Reasons for Existence
Client Testimonials
Photo Album
Services
Training
Course Roadmap
Courses
Software
Model Examples
Architecture Framework Used
MetaBuilder Clients
MetaBuilder Deployment Topologies
MetaBuilder Technology and Requirements
Downloads
Forums
Contact Us
Provide Feedback
:: Click here to sign-in ::
Discussion Boards
Business Engineering
Project Management
Object Oriented Design
Classical Project Problems
Architecture
Miscellaneous
Organisational Behaviour
Value Chain Management - Value Streams
Help
Architecture Misunderstanding
Posted by
Bert Engelbrecht
A continuous problem that customers experience is the lack of understanding of what business benefits architecture represent. A classical example is that customer's IT/IS divisions deploy a Master Information System Planning (MISP) project. This requires that control over all three architecture layers have to be established, from which the MISP will be derived. In this case eighty percent of the funding of the project is utilised for the establishment of control over architecture and only twenty percent of the project cost actually delivers IT/IS benefits. The original eighty percent funding is actually an investment from which the entire business can derive benefit, although IT/IS is funding the whole.
Board Functions
Architecture
Subject
Name
Date Posted
+
Architecture Misunderstanding
Bert Engelbrecht
01 January 2003
Architecture Misunderstanding
Johan Viljoen
21 January 2003